Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 10;12(9):2061. doi: 10.3390/polym12092061

Table 2.

Summary of the photovoltaic performance of MOF-derived PSCs discussed in the text.

MOF Material VOC
(V)
JSC
(mA/cm2)
FF PCE
(%)
Ref
ETM Co-doped Ti-MOF 1.027 24.078 0.649 15.75 [118]
ZIF-8 0.936 21.6 0.62 12.4 [119]
ZIF-8 derived ZnO 1.11 22.1 0.739 18.1 [131]
ZIF-8 derived porous carbon 1.06 22.13 0.72 17.32 [132]
MIL-125(Ti) 1.01 22.81 0.72 16.56 [136]
MIL-125(Ti)/PCBM 1.082 23.18 0.755 18.94 [137]
HTM In2 1.01 21.03 0.74 15.8 [149]
In10 1.00 24.3 0.70 17.0 [152]
POM@Cu-BTC 1.11 23.90 0.80 21.44 [153]
CuO@NiO 0.91 21.80 0.51 10.11 [157]
2D Pb-MOF 1.00 19.57 67.30 13.17 [160]
2D graphite NPC 1.06 23.51 0.76 18.51 [161]
Interlayer ZIF-8 1.02 22.82 0.73 16.99 [173]
ZIF-8 (scaffold layer) 1.23 21.8 0.59 16.8 [175]
NiO@C 1.018 22.394 0.69 15.78 [176]
MOF-808 1.068 19.64 0.79 16.55 [183]
UiO-66 1.067 20.25 0.78 17.01 [183]
Hybrid Perovskite-MOF MOF-808 1.062 21.01 0.80 17.81 [183]
UiO-66 1.072 21.85 0.77 18.01 [183]
In2 1.04 23.18 0.71 17.15 [189]
In-BTC 1.10 22.99 0.77 19.63 [191]