Table 2.
Summary of the photovoltaic performance of MOF-derived PSCs discussed in the text.
MOF Material | VOC
(V) |
JSC
(mA/cm2) |
FF | PCE (%) |
Ref | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETM | Co-doped Ti-MOF | 1.027 | 24.078 | 0.649 | 15.75 | [118] |
ZIF-8 | 0.936 | 21.6 | 0.62 | 12.4 | [119] | |
ZIF-8 derived ZnO | 1.11 | 22.1 | 0.739 | 18.1 | [131] | |
ZIF-8 derived porous carbon | 1.06 | 22.13 | 0.72 | 17.32 | [132] | |
MIL-125(Ti) | 1.01 | 22.81 | 0.72 | 16.56 | [136] | |
MIL-125(Ti)/PCBM | 1.082 | 23.18 | 0.755 | 18.94 | [137] | |
HTM | In2 | 1.01 | 21.03 | 0.74 | 15.8 | [149] |
In10 | 1.00 | 24.3 | 0.70 | 17.0 | [152] | |
POM@Cu-BTC | 1.11 | 23.90 | 0.80 | 21.44 | [153] | |
CuO@NiO | 0.91 | 21.80 | 0.51 | 10.11 | [157] | |
2D Pb-MOF | 1.00 | 19.57 | 67.30 | 13.17 | [160] | |
2D graphite NPC | 1.06 | 23.51 | 0.76 | 18.51 | [161] | |
Interlayer | ZIF-8 | 1.02 | 22.82 | 0.73 | 16.99 | [173] |
ZIF-8 (scaffold layer) | 1.23 | 21.8 | 0.59 | 16.8 | [175] | |
NiO@C | 1.018 | 22.394 | 0.69 | 15.78 | [176] | |
MOF-808 | 1.068 | 19.64 | 0.79 | 16.55 | [183] | |
UiO-66 | 1.067 | 20.25 | 0.78 | 17.01 | [183] | |
Hybrid Perovskite-MOF | MOF-808 | 1.062 | 21.01 | 0.80 | 17.81 | [183] |
UiO-66 | 1.072 | 21.85 | 0.77 | 18.01 | [183] | |
In2 | 1.04 | 23.18 | 0.71 | 17.15 | [189] | |
In-BTC | 1.10 | 22.99 | 0.77 | 19.63 | [191] |