Table 2.
The sex difference in post-resuscitation care
| References | PCI (%) | TTM (%) | CAG (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | M | F | M | F | M | |
| Perman et al. [12] | 3.84 | 9.47 | 9.30 | 18.15 | ||
| Jeong et al. [7] | 3.30 | 12.10 | 7.50 | 11.30 | ||
| Blom et al. [15] | 8.75 | 14.10 | 24.90 | 26.20 | 16.44 | 25.30 |
| Matilde et al. [23] | 17 | 30 | 47 | 61 | 58 | 88 |
| Hansen et al. [26] | 58.50 | 62.40 | 23.70 | 41.40 | ||
| Dicker et al. [11] | 68 | 64 | ||||
| Oh et al. [27] | 100 | 100 | 7.90 | 15.50 | ||
| Bougouin et al. [29] | 17.12 | 31.60 | 70.00 | 72.00 | 49.00 | 70.00 |
| Bosson et al. [32] | 47.00 | 54.00 | 33.00 | 40.00 | 11.00 | 25.00 |
| Karlsson et al. [33] | 100 | 100 | ||||
| Bray et al. [37] | 56.00 | 63.00 | ||||
| Arrich et al. [42] | 24.00 | 26.00 | ||||
F females, M males, PCI percutaneous coronary intervention, TTM target body temperature management, CAG coronary angiography