Table 2.
Prevalence of asynchrony in enrolled patients and among different classifications of brain injury
| Type of asynchrony | All patients (n = 100) | Types of brain injury | P* | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stroke (n = 44) | Post-craniotomy (n = 37) | Traumatic brain injury (n = 19) | |||
| All types | 96 (96%, 92%–100%) | 43 (98%, 93%–100%) | 35 (95%, 87%–100%) | 18 (95%, 84%-100%) | 0.670 |
| Ineffective triggering | 95 (95%, 91%–99%) | 42 (96%, 89%–100%) | 35 (95%, 87%–100%) | 18 (95%, 84%–100%) | >0.999 |
| Double-triggering | 79 (79%, 71%–87%) | 33 (75%, 62%–88%) | 30 (81%, 68%–94%) | 16 (84%, 66%–100%) | 0.690 |
| Auto-triggering | 6 (6%, 1%–11%) | 3 (7%, 0%–15%) | 2 (5%, 0%–13%) | 1 (5%, 0%–16%) | >0.999 |
| Flow insufficiency | 12 (12%, 6%–19%) | 7 (16%, 5%–27%) | 1 (3%, 0%–8%) | 4 (12%, 1%–41%) | 0.085 |
| Premature cycling | 42 (42%, 32%–52%) | 15 (34%, 20%-49%) | 16 (43%, 27%-60%) | 11 (58%, 33%-82%) | 0.221 |
| Delayed cycling | 31 (31%, 22%–40%) | 13 (30%, 16%–44%) | 13 (35%, 19%–51%) | 5 (26%, 5%–48%) | 0.782 |
| Reverse triggering | 5 (5%, 1%–9%) | 3 (7%, 0%–15%) | 0 (0) | 2 (11%, 0%–26%) | 0.221 |
Data are shown as n (%, 95% confidence interval)
*Comparison among different classifications of brain injury