Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 26;9(20):7363–7374. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3335

TABLE 1.

Randomized clinical trial (RCT) demographic characteristics according to blinding of participants and personnel

Variable Total Open‐Label Blinded
No. (%) No. (%) No. (%) P
110 (100) 68 (100) 42 (100)
Basic RTC demographics
International .13
No 65 (59.1) 44 (64.7) 21 (50.0)
Yes 45 (40.9) 24 (35.3) 21 (50.0)
Industry supported (fully or in part) <.001
No 45 (40.9) 37 (54.4) 8 (19.1)
Yes 65 (59.1) 31 (45.6) 34 (80.9)
Overall study sample size .38
≤200 patients 44 (40.0) 25 (36.8) 19 (45.2)
>200 patients 66 (60.0) 43 (63.2) 23 (54.8)
Disease stage .04
Only Advanced / metastatic 43 (39.1) 21 (30.9) 22 (52.4)
Only non‐metastatic / local 47 (42.7) 31 (45.6) 16 (38.1)
Both 20 (18.2) 16 (23.5) 4 (9.5)
Broad treatment type
Radiotherapy 36 (32.7) 25 (36.8) 11 (26.2) .25
Surgery 14 (12.7) 9 (13.2) 5 (11.9) .84
Chemotherapy 21 (19.1) 12 (17.7) 9 (21.4) .62
HT 45 (40.9) 31 (45.6) 14 (33.3) .20
Difference between treatment arms in the clinical primary end point .87
No 40 (44.0) 26 (43.3) 14 (45.2)
Yes 51 (56.0) 34 (56.7) 17 (54.8)
OS difference favouring experimental treatment .66
No 42 (38.2) 28 (41.2) 14 (33.3)
Yes 13 (11.8) 7 (10.3) 6 (14.3)
N/A (in case OS was not assessed) 55 (50.0) 33 (48.5) 22 (52.4)
PRO‐related basic characteristics
Most frequent PRO instruments
EORTC questionnaires 31 (28.2) 22 (32.4) 9 (21.4) .22
FACT questionnaires 27 (24.6) 15 (22.1) 12 (28.6) .44
Visual Analogue Scale 11 (10.0) 6 (8.8) 5 (11.9) .60
Length of PRO assessment during RCT .05
≤6 mo 29 (26.4) 17 (25.0) 12 (28.6)
≤1 y 20 (18.2) 12 (17.7) 8 (19.0)
>1 y 57 (51.8) 39 (57.3) 18 (42.9)
Unknown 4 (3.6) 0 (0) 4 (9.5)
Secondary paper on PRO .94
No 79 (71.8) 49 (72.1) 30 (71.4)
Yes 31 (28.2) 19 (27.9) 12 (28.6)

Abbreviations: EORTC, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer; FACT, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy; HT, hormone therapy; OS, overall survival; PRO, patient‐reported outcomes; RCT, randomized controlled trial.