Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 25;9(20):7672–7685. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3408

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Immune‐related prognostic signature in training set. A, Expression levels of IRGs of the prognostic signature between low‐ and high‐group in training set. P‐value < .05 (t test) was considered statistically significant. *P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001. B, Univariate Cox regression analysis on the RFS of prognostic signature. C, Interaction network of IRGs and TFs. Red circles represent danger IRGs, green circles represent protective IRGs, and triangles represent TFs. The red line represents a positive correlation, and the green line represents a negative correlation.