Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Jan 15;68:95–105. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.01.005

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Mean CBF images (only 5 axial slices were shown) from a representative subject with different processing methods. From top to bottom: meanCBF-10_nsm as input, the output of U-Net_sm, the output of DilatedNet_sm, the output of proposed DWAN_sm and the surrogate GT (meanCBF-40_sm) as training reference.