Table 2: Comparison of metabolic and hormonal parameters between the euthyroid and subclinical hypothyroidism study populations.
Variables | All subjects (n=465) | Euthyroid (n=415) | SCH (n=50) | p value |
---|---|---|---|---|
FPG, mean mmol/L ± SD | 5.08 ± 1.20 | 5.09 ± 1.24 | 4.97 ± 0.81 | 0.492 |
PG 2H-OGTT, mean mmol/L ± SD | 6.91 ± 2.43 | 6.93 ± 2.50 | 6.71 ± 1.70 | 0.553 |
Prediabetes/diabetes, % | 24.3 | 24.1 | 26.0 | 0.730 |
TC, mean mg/dL ± SD | 172.07 ± 33.88 | 171.89 ± 34.21 | 173.54 ± 31.33 | 0.745 |
TG, mean mg/dL ± SD | 144.20 ± 54.18 | 143.12 ± 53.92 | 153.14 ± 56.09 | 0.217 |
LDL-C, mean mg/dL ± SD | 103.88 ± 27.62 | 104.06 ± 27.49 | 102.32 ± 28.95 | 0.673 |
HDL-C, mean mg/dL ± SD | 38.39 ± 6.96 | 38.38 ± 7.01 | 38.57 ± 6.59 | 0.853 |
Dyslipidaemia, % | 87.5 | 87.5 | 88.0 | 1.000 |
Metabolic syndrome, % | 44.5 | 43.1 | 56.0 | 0.098 |
Serum testosterone, median ng/mL (IQR) | 0.72 (0.43–1.11) | 0.73 (0.44–1.12) | 0.55 (0.29–0.98) | 0.194 |
Serum prolactin, median ng/mL (IQR) | 12.36 (8.65–21.55) | 12.25 (8.75–20.98) | 13.61 (7.57–26.70) | 0.642 |
Elevated testosterone, % | 19.4 | 19.8 | 16.0 | 0.704 |
Elevated prolactin, % | 13.1 | 12.8 | 16.0 | 0.508 |
Serum TSH, median μIU/mL (IQL) | 1.44 (0.88–2.79) | 1.32 (0.83–2.15) | 7.38 (5.74–9.81) | <0.001 |
Serum FT4, mean ng/dL ± SD | 1.29 ± 0.30 | 1.31 ± 0.29 | 1.09 ± 0.29 | <0.001 |
Serum anti-TPO, median IU/mL (IQR) | 9.71 (3.25–25.73) | 7.76 (3.08–15.64) | 88.02 (10.00–560.29) | <0.001 |
Anti-TPO positive, % | 18.3 | 13.0 | 62.0 | <0.001 |
p value by Student’s t-test, Chi-square test or Mann–Whitney U test as applicable.
Anti-TPO = anti-thyroid peroxidase; FPG = fasting plasma glucose; FT4 = free thyroxine; HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; IQR = interquartile range;
LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; PG 2H-OGTT = plasma glucose 2 hours after oral glucose tolerance test; SCH = subclinical hypothyroidism; TC = total cholesterol;
TG = triglyceride; TSH = thyroid-stimulating hormone.