Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 19;10:17686. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74574-z

Table 1.

Differentially expressed proteins in BsTS-dm vs CiTS-dm comparison.

# Spot SSP BeTS-dm vs CNT CiTS-dm vs CNT Accession number Description matched protein Score Coverage (%) MW (kDa)/pI
4208 = B8NHZ4

AflM/ ver-1/ dehydrogenase/ ketoreductase

OS = Aspergillus flavus

99 8 28.107 / 6.31
4515 = A0A2P2HTF7

Acyl-coA-binding protein (ACBP)

OS = Aspergillus flavus

150 18 15.569/5.61
5311 = A0A0F0IEE3

Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

OS = Aspergillus flavus

72 3 40.707/8.94
5508 = A0A2P2GYJ6

Alcohol dehydrogenase

OS = Aspergillus flavus

265 15 37.402/6.34
7710 A0A2P2HKD7

Superoxide dismutase [Cu–Zn]

OS = Aspergillus flavus

94 14 16.913/6.03
6609 = A0A2P2HBZ5

WD domain G-beta repeat

OS = Aspergillus flavus

167 12 35.395/6.21

Variation in spot abundance between BeTS-dm and CiTS-dm treatment (50 μM), and control (0.5% DMSO) is indicated with a upward (↑) or downward (↓) pointing arrow for up-regulated and down-regulated peptides respectively. Fold changes were considered statistically significant when exceeded both a fold of variation > 2.0 (p ≤ 0.01).