Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pain. 2020 Nov;161(11):2446–2461. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001952

Table 2.

Major factors to consider in determining the clinical importance of group differences (adapted from Dworkin et al. [23])

  • Statistical significance of the primary efficacy analysis (typically necessary but not sufficient to determine that the group difference is clinically meaningful)

  • Availability of alternative therapies and their benefit-risk profiles

  • Treatment effect size for the primary outcome variable compared to that of available treatments

  • Safety and tolerability

  • Rapidity of onset of treatment effect

  • Durability of treatment effect

  • Results for secondary efficacy endpoints (e.g., improvements in physical or emotional functioning)

  • Limitations of available treatments

  • Different mechanism of action vs. existing treatments

  • Cost, convenience, and patient adherence

  • Other benefits (e.g., few or no drug interactions, availability of a test that predicts a good therapeutic response)