Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 15.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Res. 2020 Jul 8;80(20):4314–4323. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-0291

Table 1. Techniques to analyze metastasis progression in the brain.

There are multiple available techniques (columns) for assessing the development and treatment of brain metastasis. In selecting the most appropriate approach, it is essential that the researcher considers different parameters (rows). Each cell in the table provides binary information (yes (white background)/ no (red background)) regarding the compatibility of the technique with the specific parameter. However, for several parameters it is important to consider additional quantitative or qualitative aspects. For example, the row testing “sensitivity” can be divided into the different stages of brain metastasis development. The different stages derive from the number of cells in a given metastasis (see (*) at the bottom). The parameters “technical requirement” and “time requirement” do not respond to binary options but are better defined by semiquantitative considerations of feasibility and resource requirements. Finally, the last row reflects potential limitations for a given technique, such as the need to have the BrM cells engineered with particular reporters or the need to use antibodies. We provide a graded code using “+” signs to suggests what is (+) somehow suitable, (++) suitable, and (+++) optimal. A key reference has been added to each technique to provide an example of its implementation.

Histology52 FACS25 PCR37 MRI31 Bioluminescence22,53 Two-photon video-microscopy54
Techniques to analyze metastasis progression graphic file with name nihms-1610523-t0001.jpg graphic file with name nihms-1610523-t0002.jpg graphic file with name nihms-1610523-t0003.jpg graphic file with name nihms-1610523-t0004.jpg graphic file with name nihms-1610523-t0005.jpg graphic file with name nihms-1610523-t0006.jpg
Compatible with in vivo No No No Yes(+++) (Non-invasive) Yes(+++) (Non-invasive) Yes (+++) (Partially-invasive)
Sensitivity (*) Single cell→Big Medium-Big Medium-Big Medium-Big Medium-Big Single cell→Small
Number of metastases Yes (+++) No No Yes(++) Yes (+) No (In field-of-view only
Size Yes (+++) No No Yes(++) Yes (+) Yes (+++)
Distribution Yes (+++) No No Yes(+++) Yes(++) No
Growth Yes (+++) (cellular pattern) No No Yes(+++) (over time) Yes(+++) (over time) Yes(+++) (cell, pattern/over time)
Microenvironment features Yes (+++) Yes (++) Yes (+) Yes (++) No Yes(+++)
Technical requirement (Equipment/ expertise) Low/ Low (+++) Low/ Low (+++) Low/ Low (+++) High/ High Medium/ Medium (++) High/ High
Time requirement Medium-high Low (+++) Low (+++) Medium Low (+++) High
Info about extra-cranial No No No No Yes(+++) No
Particular considerations Antibodies Antibodies and/ or Engineering BrM cells Relative quantification High field strength Engineering BrM cells Engineering BrM eel
(*)

Sensitivity: Small (micrometastasis): 5–50 cells

Medium (micrometastasis): <500 cells

Big (macrometastasis): >1000 ceils

Suitability:

(+)

Somehow suitable

(++)

Suitable

(+++)

Optimal