Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Sci. 2020 Nov;21(8):1114–1125. doi: 10.1007/s11121-020-01162-y

Table 2.

Resources used by group and year for the sites in each state


Alabama sites Georgia sites

MPC+GTO (n=8 sites) MPC (n=8 sites) MPC+GTO (n=8 sites) MPC (n=8 sites)

Year 1 Resource use – hours GTO Staff BGC BGC GTO Staff BGC BGC
MPC training - BGC staff timea 26.8 (7.1) 23.4 (6.7) 33.6 (20.2) 26.1 (21.0)
MPC training – trainer time 4.1 (1.7) 3.3 (1.1) 4.2 (1.3) 2.7 (1.3)
MPC trainer travel time 1.0 (0.4) 0.9 (0.5) 1.0 (1.0) 0.4 (0.2)
MPC implementation timeb 8.0 (--) 8.0 (--) 8.0 (--) 8.0 (--)

Hours spent on GTO training & TA at sitec 15.4 (6.6) 30.6 (15.3) 11.7 (5.3) 29.2 (7.0)
Travel time to sites for TA 10.5 (4.9) 2.0 (3.2) 4.3 (2.6) 2.0 (1.2)
TA supervision - supervisor timeb 1.4 (--) 1.4 (--)
TA supervision - TA timeb 2.8 (--) 2.8 (--)

Year 1 Resource use – MPC workbooks for attendees, miles and hotel nights for MPC trainer and TA

MPC workbooks (1 per attendee)d 14.0 (3.7) 11.4 (5.0) 16.9 (4.0) 18.0 (2.8)
MPC trainer miles 57.4 (22.3) 52.7 (30.2) 25.9 (23.0) 11.2 (7.3)
MPC trainer hotel nights 0.2 (0.2) 0.3 (0.2) 0.0 (0.0) 0.0 (0.0)
GTO and BGC staff TA miles 626.9 (304.1) 77.3 (86.5) 114.5 (97.5) 47.2 (22.1)
GTO TA hotel nights 0.1 (0.1) 0.0 (0.0)

Year 2 Resource use – hourse

MPC training - BGC staff timef 6.4 (3.2) 5.7 (1.0) 13.8 (2.7) 13.5 (2.8)
MPC training – trainer time 1.2 (0.7) 1.0 (0.3) 1.5 (0.7) 1.4 (0.7)
MPC trainer travel time 0.9 (0.5) 0.8 (0.4) 0.3 (0.3) 0.2 (0.0)
MPC implementation timeb 8.0 (--) 8.0 (--) 8.0 (--) 8.0 (--)

Hours spent on GTO training & TA at siteg 18.9 (6.4) 47.4 (6.4) 9.9 (6.3) 20.5 (11.9)
Travel time to sites for TA 11.3 (4.8) 6.7 (6.4) 4.0 (2.5) 0.8 (0.6)
TA supervision - supervisor timeb 1.4 (--) 1.4 (--)
TA supervision - TA timeb 2.8 (--) 2.8 (--)

Year 2 Resource use – MPC workbooks for attendees, miles and hotel nights for MPC trainer and TAb

MPC workbooks (1 per attendee)h 9.8 (4.2) 10.7 (5.3) 18.0 (3.4) 15.3 (3.0)
MPC trainer miles 50.5 (26.9) 41.5 (23.0) 8.6 (4.9) 7.1 (1.5)
MPC trainer hotel nights 0.0 (0.0) 0.0 (0.0) 0.0 (0.0) 0.0 (0.0)
GTO and BGC staff TA miles 669.9 (301.8) 304.8 (126.5) 102.4 (88.0) 19.9 (18.4)
GTO TA hotel nights 0.1 (0.1) 0.0 (0.0)

Note: Table values are means and standard deviations. BGC = Boys and Girls Club; MPC = Making Proud Choices an evidence-based program to prevent teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections in youth; GTO = Getting to Outcomes implementation support system; TA = GTO technical assistance.

a

In year 1 across groups average hours of BGC staff time for MPC training for Alabama (M:25.1, SD:6.9) was not significantly different than for Georgia (M:29.8, SD:20.3), t18=0.89, p=0.774.

b

The use of these resources was not tracked by site. We estimated MPC implementation time based on 8 sessions of 1 hour each, and we averaged total TA supervision time across sites.

c

In year 1 the Alabama MPC+GTO group had higher GTO staff and BGC hours than the Georgia group, but this difference was not significant (GTO staff t13=1.24, p=0.705; BGC t10=0.23, p=0.823).

d

In year 1 across groups the Georgia sites had more attendees per site (M:17.4, SD:3.4) than the Alabama sites (M:12.7, SD:4.4), t28=3.41, p=.010.

e

One Alabama control site dropped out in Year 2 so the MPC group averages are across the remaining 7 sites.

f

In year 2 across groups average hours of BGC staff time for Alabama (M:6.1, SD:2.4) was significantly lower than for Georgia (M:13.6, SD:2.7), t29=8.30, p<.001.

g

In year 2 the Alabama MPC+GtO group had higher GTO staff and BGC hours than the Georgia group, but only the higher BGC staff hours reached the threshold of statistical significance (GTO staff t14=2.85, p=0.052; BGC t11=5.61, p=0.001).

h

In year 2 across groups the Georgia sites had more attendees per site (M:16.6, SD:3.4) than the Alabama sites (M:10.2, SD:4.6), t26=4.38, p=0.001.