Table 2.
Ambulatory functions according to dichotomized Koval’s categories (ambulatory outdoors: 1, 2, 3; ambulatory housebound: 4, 5, 6, 7)
| Follow-up period | Group | Ambulatory outdoors | Ambulatory housebound | P valuea | P valueb | P valuec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative period (n = 151) | Group A | 58 (75.3%) | 19 (26.7%) | N/A | ||
| Group B | 56 (76.7%) | 18 (24.3%) | ||||
| 1st year-follow-up (n = 112) | Group A | 37 (63.8%) | 21 (36.2%) | 0.548 | 0.018 | |
| Group B | 38 (70.4%) | 16 (29.6%) | 0.133 | |||
| 2nd year-follow-up (n = 75) | Group A | 27 (67.5%) | 13 (32.5%) | N/A | 0.323 | 0.183 |
| Group B | 24 (68.6%) | 11 (31.4%) | 0.160 | 0.032 |
aComparison at each follow-up between the two groups
bComparison with previous year in each group
cComparison between the preoperative period and the 2nd year-follow-up in each group