Table 3.
Comparison of the different annotation methods based on mAP value
| Method | 20% FFG | 50% FFG | [20%,50%] randomly selected |
|---|---|---|---|
| mAP | 0.86 ± 0.03 | 0.90 ± 0.02 | 0.93 ± 0.05 |
Comparison of the different annotation methods based on mAP value
| Method | 20% FFG | 50% FFG | [20%,50%] randomly selected |
|---|---|---|---|
| mAP | 0.86 ± 0.03 | 0.90 ± 0.02 | 0.93 ± 0.05 |