Table 2.
Results of Pre/Post Survey of Residents’ Liberation Medicine Knowledge and Skills (N = 17)
| Pre-curriculum* | Post-curriculum | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Define Liberation Medicine | |||
| I can describe the concept of Liberation Medicine | 3.53 ± 0.95 | 5.00 ± 0.69 | < 0.0001 |
| I recognize how to apply the ideals of Liberation Medicine to my clinical practice | 3.17 ± 0.99 | 4.78 ± 0.73 | < 0.0001 |
| I can describe biological, psychological, and social factors that influence the health of individuals and families | 5.17 ± 0.79 | 5.39 ± 0.78 | 0.36 |
| I have an awareness of the impact of societal injustice on health status | 5.61 ± 0.50 | 5.50 ± 0.79 | 0.63 |
| I am comfortable defining implicit bias | 4.61 ± 0.92 | 5.22 ± 0.88 | 0.04 |
| Individual advocacy | |||
| I can address social determinants of health in clinical care with my patients | 4.78 ± 1.00 | 4.89 ± 0.90 | 0.7 |
| My own subconscious bias has the potential to impact the medical care I deliver | 5.61 ± 0.61 | 5.22 ± 0.65 | 0.07 |
| I am able to advocate for individual patients and families within clinical encounters | 4.78 ± 0.65 | 5.00 ± 0.69 | 0.3 |
| I can promote human dignity and patient empowerment within the clinical encounter | 4.89 ± 0.68 | 5.00 ± 0.91 | 0.61 |
| Community advocacy | |||
| I can identify specific examples where communities or community organizations have attempted to address social determinants of health | 4.72 ± 1.07 | 4.94 ± 0.87 | 0.26 |
| I can promote principles of social medicine within the larger medical community | 4.94 ± 0.94 | 4.78 ± 0.81 | 0.53 |
| I can identify strategies to collaborate with communities to address the health needs of that community | 3.94 ± 1.06 | 4.28 ± 0.96 | 0.16 |
| I am able to advocate for my patient population on a local level | 4.17 ± 0.86 | 4.44 ± 0.78 | 0.35 |
| Public health advocacy | |||
| I recognize how to apply the ideals of Liberation Medicine to clinical research | 2.61 ± 0.98 | 4.67 ± 0.77 | < 0.0001 |
| I am able to advocate for my patient population at a national level | 3.53 ± 1.04 | 4.39 ± 0.92 | 0.009 |
| I recognize the power of the physician’s voice in the public domain | 4.94 ± 0.80 | 5.33 ± 0.84 | 0.17 |
| I am comfortable communicating with my key legislators about issues that are important to my patients | 3.39 ± 1.42 | 4.22 ± 1.40 | 0.005 |
| I am comfortable writing an editorial about an issue important to my patients | 3.00 ± 1.08 | 4.33 ± 0.91 | < 0.0001 |
| I recognize how research results can be used as a tool for advocating on behalf of patients and communities | 5.00 ± 0.91 | 5.11 ± 0.90 | 0.61 |
| I am able to apply research results to advocate on behalf of patients and communities | 4.06 ± 1.06 | 4.89 ± 1.08 | 0.003 |
*Rated on a Likert scale where 1=strongly disagree to 6=strongly agree