Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 16;54(6):767–775. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00101-x

Table 1.

Description of selected studies

Study Participants (N; Age) Surgical approach (N) Gait analysis Statistically significant results
vs. preoperative state vs. CON
Foucher et al. [25]

THR: 26; 59 ± 9

CON: 25; 54 ± 6

AN: 13

A-P: 13

6 walking trials:

-4 at self-selected normal speed

-2 at self-selected fast (CON and pre) or low (CON and post) speed

↑ 38% dynamic hip ROM at 12 months (p < 0.001) ↓ dynamic hip ROM at 12 months (p ≤ 0.045)
Foucher et al. [26]

THR: 28; 63.6 ± 7.1

CON: 25; 57.6 ± 7.7

L: 13

P: 15

6 walking trials:

-2 at self-selected low speed

-2 at self-selected normal speed

-2 at self-selected fast speed

↑ dynamic hip ROM at 12 months (p < 0.012) ↓ dynamic hip ROM at 12 months (p < 0.04)
Foucher and Wimmer [31]

THR: 26; 59 ± 9

CON: 25; 54 ± 6

A:13

A-P: 13

6 walking trials:

-4 at self-selected normal speed

-2 at self-selected fast (CON and pre) or low

(CON and post) speed

No differences in contralateral hip/knee gait kinematics ↓ dynamic knee (contralateral) ROM at 12 months (p = 0.015)
Horstmann et al. [32]

THR: 52; 58.0 ± 9.0

CON: 24; 54.0 ± 6.6

L: 52 ND

↑ dynamic hip ROM at 6 months (p < 0.001)

↑ dynamic hip (contralateral) ROM at 6 months (p = 0.005)

↑ dynamic knee (affected and contralateral) ROM at 6 months (p < 0.001)

↓ dynamic limb ROM at 6 months (p < 0.001)

↓ dynamic hip (contralateral) ROM at 6 months (p = 0.012)

↓ dynamic knee (contralateral) ROM at 6 months (p < 0.012)

↓ step length (p < 0.001)

Lavigne et al. [24]

THR: 24; 49.8

HR: 24; 49.6

CON: 14; 44.4

P: 24 5 walking trials at normal and fast speeds ND

↑ walking speed at 12 months (p = 0.001)

↑ cadence at 12 months (p < 0.05)

Lugade et al. [14]

THR: 23; 56.9 ± 3.4–57.0 ± 7.3

CON: 10; 59.9 ± 5.3

A: 12

A-L: 11

5 walking trials at self-selected speed

↑ single limb support time symmetry in A THR at 6 weeks (p < 0.009)

↑ single limb support time symmetry in A THR (p < 0.001) and A-P THR (p = 0.017) at 4 months

↑step length in A THR (p = 0.017) at 4 months

↓ symmetry for step length in A-L THR at 6 weeks (p = 0.018) and 4 months (p = 0.012)

↑ pelvic drop at midstance of the affected limb in A THR (p = 0.002) and A-L THR (p = 0.032)

Naili et al. [29]

THR: 34; 66.9 ± 9.0

CON: 25; 65.7 ± 9.5

A-L: 34 5 walking trials at self-selected speed

↑ walking speed (p < 0.05) and normalized walking speed at 12 months (p < 0.001)

↑ stride length at 12 months (p < 0.001)

↑ gait pattern of operated and non-operated limbs at 12 months (measured by GDI)

↓ walking speed and normalized walking sped at 12 months (p < 0.05)

↓ stride length at 12 months (p < 0.001)

Nantel et al. [27]

THR: 10; 49 ± 7.5

HR: 10; 44.9 ± 8.5

CON: 10; 48.6 ± 6

P: 10 4 walking trials with normal cadence No statistically significant results at 6 months No statistically significant results at 6 months
Rösler and Perka [28]

THR: 26; 64.6 ± 7.7

CON: 20; 42.1 ± 13.5

L Walking trials at “acceptable” speed ↓flexion and extension of the hip and ipsilateral knee (cranialization of the centre of rotation) ND
Wesseling et al. [30]

THR: 14; 47.3 ± 11.8

CON: 18; 53.0 ± 5.0

A: 14 Walking trials at self-selected speed

HCF peak 1:

↑ hip adduction on at 6 (p = 0.036) and at 12 months (p = 0.006)

↓ ankle flexion at 6 months (p = 0.009)

HCF peak 2:

↑ hip flexion at 3,6 and 12 months (p < 0.001)

↑ hip adduction at 12 months (p = 0.011)

↑ hip rotation at 3 (p = 0.011), 6 (p = 0.005) and 12 months (p = 0.002)

↑ hip rotation (contralateral) at 3 (p = 0.016), 6 (p = 0.038) and 12 months (p = 0.005)

↓ knee flexion at 3.6 and 12 months (p < 0.001)

↓ ankle flexion at 6 months (p = 0.027) and ↑ from 6 to 12 months (p = 0.004)

↓hip adduction angle

Age is given as mean ± standard deviation

↑ higher/improvement, ↓ lower, A anterior, A-L antero-lateral, A-P antero-posterior, CON control, GDI Gait Deviation Index, HR hip resurfacing, L lateral, N number of patients, ND no data, P posterior, ROM hip range of motion, THR total hip replacement