Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 6;39(4):219–226. doi: 10.12938/bmfh.2020-018

Table 3. Relative abundance of predominant taxa at the family level.

Sample type Small intestine Cecum Colon



Groups CT P CT P CT P
Lactobacillaceae (%) 91.72 ± 6.88 81.23 ± 8.05 27.32 ± 7.59 13.39 ± 7.03* 39.68 ± 9.84 16.59 ± 11.25*
Muribaculaceae (%) 0.11 ± 0.07 2.34 ± 1.67* 21.10 ± 10.27 21.47 ± 10.59 12.46 ± 8.52 25.08 ± 8.88
Lachnospiraceae (%) 0.15 ± 0.12 0.67 ± 0.74 8.18 ± 5.74 30.01 ± 10.13** 13.04 ± 4.95 23.76 ± 4.28*
Erysipelotrichaceae (%) 0.05 ± 0.04 4.25 ± 5.61 15.07 ± 10.30 2.34 ± 2.24 2.38 ± 2.97 6.17 ± 6.87
Ruminococcaceae (%) 0.31 ± 0.53 0.33 ± 0.16 8.00 ± 3.80 9.88 ± 3.71 3.59 ± 3.57 6.15 ± 2.42
SCFA-Producing Bacteria (%) 0.51 ± 0.68 5.24 ± 5.17 31.26 ± 4.69 42.22 ± 5.30* 19.00 ± 6.77 36.08 ± 7.40*

T-tests were used to evaluate the significant differences in each bacterial population at the family level. Each value is presented as the mean ± SD. *p<0.05 vs. CT; **p<0.01 vs. CT. CT: non-treated mice, P: MP-treated mice, SCFA: short-chain fatty acid.