Table 4. Relative abundance of predominant taxa at the genus level.
| Sample type | Small intestine | Cecum | Colon | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Groups | CT | P | CT | P | CT | P |
| Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group (%) | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.29 ± 0.32 | 0.97 ± 0.62 | 7.31 ± 3.69* | 2.41 ± 1.49 | 10.07 ± 5.05* |
| Dubosiella (%) | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 3.08 ± 3.76 | 10.03 ± 11.14 | 1.53 ± 1.77 | 0.84 ± 1.29 | 3.92 ± 4.42 |
| Prevotellaceae_UCG-001 (%) | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.05 ± 0.07 | 4.98 ± 2.44 | 2.09 ± 1.04 | 5.88 ± 5.71 | 3.13 ± 2.20 |
| Escherichia-Shigella (%) | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 1.99 ± 3.95 | 0.62 ± 0.59 | 0.58 ± 0.86 | 6.15 ± 10.26 | 2.13 ± 4.08 |
| Roseburia (%) | 0.02 ± 0.04 | 0.05 ± 0.07 | 2.90 ± 5.06 | 3.12 ± 1.32 | 3.26 ± 4.22 | 1.72 ± 0.58 |
T-tests were used to evaluate the significant differences in each bacterial population at the genus level. Each value is presented as the mean ± SD. *p<0.05 vs. CT. CT: non-treated mice, P: MP-treated mice.