Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 5;11:568503. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.568503

Table 4.

Profile of antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with APS or healthy controls.

Total positivity
APS Healthy controls (n=120) χ12 P1 χ22 P2
Total (n=212) PAPS (n = 153) SAPS (n = 59)
aCL 118 (55.66%) 72 (47.06%) 46 (77.97%) 3 (2.5%) 93.49 <0.001 16.481 <0.001
 IgA–aCL 33 (15.57%) 18 (11.76%) 15 (25.42%) 0 20.741 <0.001 6.044 0.020
 IgG–aCL 106 (50%) 64 (41.83%) 42 (71.19%) 1 (0.83%) 84.807 <0.001 14.678 <0.001
 IgM–aCL 19 (8.96%) 10 (6.54%) 9 (15.25%) 2 (1.67%) 6.883 0.009 3.967 0.060
aβ2GPI 122 (57.55%) 79 (51.64%) 43 (72.88%) 5 (4.17%) 92.441 <0.001 7.868 0.005
 IgA–aβ2GPⅠ 28 (13.21%) 16 (10.46%) 12 (20.34%) 0 17.309 <0.001 3.627 0.070
 IgG–aβ2GPⅠ 90 (42.45%) 56 (36.60%) 34 (57.63%) 0 69.889 <0.001 7.705 0.008
 IgM–aβ2GPⅠ 57 (26.89%) 33 (21.57%) 24 (40.68%) 5 (4.17%) 26.045 <0.001 7.910 0.006
Isolated positivity
aCL
 IgA–aCL 4 (1.89%) 3 (1.96%) 1 (1.70%) 0 2.292 0.130 0.016 0.899
 IgG–aCL 72 (33.96%) 45 (29.41%) 27 (45.76%) 1 (0.83%) 49.028 <0.001 5.076 0.035
 IgM–aCL 7 (3.3%) 5 (3.27%) 2 (3.39%) 2 (1.67%) 0.777 0.378 0.002 0.965
aβ2GPI
 IgA–aβ2GPⅠ 1 (0.47%) 1 (0.65%) 0 0 0.658 0.451 0.387 0.534
 IgG–aβ2GPⅠ 45 (21.23%) 34 (22.22%) 11 (18.64%) 0 29.466 <0.001 0.326 0.583
 IgM–aβ2GPⅠ 28 (13.21%) 20 (13.07%) 8 (13.56%) 5 (4.17%) 6.997 0.008 0.009 0.925

P1, APS vs. HC; P2, PAPS vs. SAPS.