Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 19;3(10):e2015748. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15748

Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Studies Included in the Network Meta-analysis of Patients With ES-SCLC.

Source Phase Treatment Participants, No. ORR, No./total No. (%) DCR PFS, median, m HR (95% CI) P value OS, median, m HR (95% CI) P value TRAE 3-5, No./total No. (%)
Paz-Ares et al,16 2019 3 Durvalumab plus etoposide-platinum chemotherapy 268 182/268 (67.9) NR 5.10 0.78 (0.65-0.94) NR 13.00 0.73 (0.59-0.91) .005 163/265 (61.5)
Etoposide-platinum chemotherapy 269 155/269 (57.6) NR 5.40 10.30 166/266 (62.4)
Kim et al,37 2019 3 Irinotecan plus carboplatin 173 108/173 (62.4) 132/173 (76.3) 6.50 0.846 (0.709-1.008) .12 10.90 0.879 (0.73-1.05) .12 NR
Etoposide plus carboplatin 189 91/189 (48.1) 142/189 (75.1) 5.80 10.30 NR
Horn et al,17 2018 3 Atezolizumab plus etoposide plus carboplatin 201 121/201 (60.2) 163/201 (81.1) 5.20 0.77 (0.62-0.96) .02 12.30 0.70 (0.54-0.91) .007 115/198 (58.1)
Etoposide plus carboplatin 202 130/202 (64.4) 173/202 (85.6) 4.30 10.30 113/196 (57.7)
Tiseo et al,12 2017 3 Etoposide-platinum chemotherapy plus bevacizumab 103 57/103 (55.3) 73/103 (70.9) 5.70 0.72 (0.54-0.97) .03 8.90 0.78 (0.58-1.06) .11 64/103 (62.1)
Etoposide plus platinum 101 59/101 (58.4) 68/101 (67.3) 6.70 9.80 52/95 (54.7)
Reck et al,18 2016 3 Ipilimumab plus etoposide-platinum chemotherapy 566 297/478 (62.1) 422/478 (88.3) 4.60 0.85 (0.74-0.97) .02 11.00 0.94 (0.81-1.09) .38 231/478 (48.3)
Etoposide-platinum chemotherapy 566 196/476 (41.2) 422/476 (88.7) 4.40 10.90 214/476 (45.0)
Shi et al,34 2015 2 Irinotecan plus cisplatin 30 21/30 (70.0) 21/30 (70) 6.00 NR NR 18.10 NR NR NR
Etoposide plus cisplatin 32 21/32 (65.6) 23/32 (71.9) 6.00 15.10 NR
Schmittel et al,39 2011 3 Irinotecan plus carboplatin 106 66/106 (62.3) NR 6.00 1.29 (0.96-1.73) .07 10.00 1.34 (0.97-1.85) .06 NR
Etoposide plus carboplatin 110 69/110 (62.7) NR 6.00 9.00 NR
Spigel et al,11 2011 2 Etoposide-platinum chemotherapy plus bevacizumab 52 30/52 (57.7) NR 5.50 0.52 (0.32-0.83) NR 9.40 1.16 (0.66-2.04) NR 38/51 (74.5)
Etoposide-platinum chemotherapy 50 24/50 (48.0) NR 4.40 10.50 28/47 (59.6)
Zatloukal et al,40 2010 3 Irinotecan plus cisplatin 202 79/202 (26.1) 156/202 (77.2) NR NR NR 10.20 0.81 (0.65-1.01) .06 NR
Etoposide plus cisplatin 203 94/203 (46.3) 155/203 (76.4) NR 9.70 NR
Lara et al,10 2009 3 Irinotecan plus cisplatin 324 194/324 (59.9) NR 5.80 NR .07 9.90 NR .71 213/317 (67.2)
Etoposide plus cisplatin 327 186/327 (78.5) NR 5.20 9.10 274/324 (84.6)
Hermes et al,36 2008 3 Irinotecan plus carboplatin 105 NR NR NR NR NR 8.50 1.41 (1.06-1.87) .02 NR
Etoposide plus carboplatin 104 NR NR NR 7.10 NR
Hanna et al,35 2006 3 Irinotecan plus cisplatin 221 106/221 (48.0) 115/221 (52) 4.10 NR .37 9.30 NR .74 NR
Etoposide plus cisplatin 110 48/110 (43.6) 56/110 (50.9) 4.60 10.20 NR
Schmittel et al,33 2006 2 Irinotecan plus carboplatin 35 22/35 (62.9) 25/35 (71.4) 9.00 NR .03 NR NR NR NR
Etoposide plus carboplatin 35 20/35 (57.1) 23/35 (65.7) 6.00 NR NR
Noda et al,38 2002 3 Irinotecan plus cisplatin 77 65/77 (84.4) NR
NR
6.90 0.61 (0.44-0.84) .003 12.80 NR .002 NR
Etoposide plus cisplatin 77 52/77 (67.5) 4.80 9.40 NR

Abbreviations: DCR, disease control rate; ES-SCLC, extensive-stage small cell lung cancer; HR, hazard ratio; NR, not reported; ORR, objective response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; TRAE 3-5, treatment-related adverse event, grades 3 to 5.