Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 20;20:1575. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09629-x

Table 3.

Respondent characteristics, concern level and practice adherence status associated with scoring in the high knowledge category on the tick-borne diseases KAP survey

n High Knowledge, n (%) Odds ratio
(95% CI)
Adjusted OR
(95% CI)
Sex
 Male 61 47 (77) 1.46 (0.56–3.78) 1.57 (0.57–4.36)
 Female 33 23 (70) 1.0
Age group
  ≥ 46 years 41 31 (76) 1.09 (0.43–2.77) 1.17 (0.38–3.64)
  < 46 years 54 40 (74) 1.0
Years in current job
  > 10 years 70 53 (76) 1.21 (0.43–3.40) 1.16 (0.30–4.43)
  ≤ 10 years 25 18 (72) 1.0
Time spent working outdoors
  > 20 h/week 46 34 (74) 0.92 (0.36–2.32) 0.94 (0.34–2.58)
  ≤ 20 h/week 49 37 (75) 1.0
TBD diagnosis
 Yes 25 19 (76) 1.10 (0.38–3.17) 1.52 (0.45–5.09)
 No 70 52 (74) 1.0
Tick exposure
 High 71 52 (73) 0.58 (0.17–1.91) 0.52 (0.15–1.84)
 Low 23 19 (83) 1.0
Concern level
 High 56 44 (79) 1.63 (0.64–4.14) 1.79 (0.56–5.73)
 Low 39 27 (69) 1.0
Practice adherence
 High 61 44 (72) 0.67 (0.25–1.83) 0.41 (0.12–1.36)
 Low 34 27 (79) 1.0

Odds ratios (95% CIs) were estimated in univariate logistic regression models and aORs (95% CIs) were based on multivariate logistic regression models that included all of the respondent factors listed as explanatory variables