Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 20;20:1575. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09629-x

Table 4.

Respondent characteristics, knowledge and practice adherence status associated with being classified as having high concern for tick-borne diseases

n High Concern, n (%) Odds ratio
(95% CI)
Adjusted OR
(95% CI)
Sex
 Male 61 35 (57) 0.88 (0.37–2.07) 1.49 (0.49–4.51)
 Female 33 20 (61) 1.0
Age group
  ≥ 46 years 41 21 (51) 0.57 (0.25–1.31) 0.10 (0.03–0.41)
  < 46 years 54 35 (65) 1.0
Years in current job
  > 10 years 70 48 (69) 4.64 (1.74–12.36) 18.82 (4.11–86.17)
  ≤ 10 years 25 8 (32) 1.0
Time spent working outdoors
  > 20 h/week 46 25 (54) 0.69 (0.30–1.57) 0.68 (0.24–2.00)
  ≤ 20 h/week 49 31 (63) 1.0
TBD diagnosis
 Yes 25 16 (64) 1.73 (0.52–3.43) 0.65 (0.18–2.33)
 No 70 40 (57) 1.0
Tick exposure
 High 71 42 (59) 0.93 (0.36–2.44) 0.49 (0.14–1.78)
 Low 23 14 (61) 1.0
Knowledge
 High 71 44 (62) 1.63 (0.64–4.14) 1.98 (0.61–6.36)
 Low 24 12 (50) 1.0
Practice adherence
 High 61 43 (70) 3.86 (1.59–9.34) 7.56 (2.20–26.05)
 Low 34 13 (38) 1.0

Odds ratios (95% CIs) were estimated in univariate logistic regression models and aORs (95% CIs) were based on multivariate logistic regression models that included all of the respondent factors listed as explanatory variables