. 2020 Oct 14;40(42):8119–8131. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0524-20.2020

Table 1.

Difference between the both-changed and both-repeated conditions as a function of ROI

	Area AL			Area ML			Area PL			Area AM
	Changed– repeated	Observed p value	Sig	Changed– repeated	Observed p value	Sig	Changed– repeated	Observed p value	Sig	Changed– repeated	Observed p value	Sig
Subject K	1.218	<0.001	^*	1.110	<0.001	^*	1.690	<0.001	^*	0.031	0.734
Subject F	0.623	<0.001	^*	0.538	<0.001	^*	0.409	<0.001	^*	0.044	0.253
Subject J	0.230	<0.001	^*	0.379	<0.001	^*	0.342	<0.001	^*	–0.120	0.001
	Area AF			Area MF			EVC			Amyg
	Changed– repeated	Observed p value	Sig	Changed– repeated	Observed p value	Sig	Changed– repeated	Observed p value	Sig	Changed– repeated	Observed p value	Sig
Subject K	1.213	<0.001	^*	1.583	<0.001	^*	1.139	<0.001	^*	0.957	<0.001	^*
Subject F	0.446	<0.001	^*	0.559	<0.001	^*	1.340	<0.001	^*	0.405	<0.001	^*
Subject J	0.240	<0.001	^*	0.495	<0.001	^*	0.114	<0.001	^*	0.230	<0.001	^*

Sig, Significance.

*Evidence of adaptation to changeable aspects of the face of the avatar.