Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 14;40(42):8132–8148. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1671-20.2020

Table 3.

Best fit parameters for pooled data

c1 λ1 c2 λ2 c3 λ3
Cones 3.673e+05 −7.828e0 −2e+05 −2.000e+03 2.034e+04 −2.164e-01
S-cones 5.048e+03 −3.014e0 −1.1e+04 −7.869e0 1.455e+03 −1.370e-01
Ganglion cells 5.717e+05 −1.031e0 −6e+05 −1.261e0 −5.527e+01 −9.658e+01
OFF midget bipolar cells 4.208e+05 −1.225e0 −4.551e+05 −1.387e0 1.230e+04 −6.986e-02
DB3a cells 4.275e+03 −1.949e-01 −9.614e+03 −5.831e0 3.336e+02 5.811e-03
DB3b cells 7.061e+03 −1.511e-01 −7.869e+03 −3.120e0 −3.653e+03 −3.347e-01

Numbers show best fit parameters for sum-of-exponential fits. c1, c2, c3, multiplicative coefficients. λ2, λ2, λ3, exponential coefficients.