Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 5;20(3):e245–e250. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2020.20.03.002

Table 2.

Summary of selected research evaluating the use of noninvasive ventilation and high-flow nasal cannulae therapy during paediatric transport3238

Author and year of study Study design Mode of respiratory support Sample Outcome
Schlapbach et al.32 (2014) Retrospective study Invasive ventilation, NIV or HFNCT 793 infants aged ≤2 years
  • The frequency of both invasive ventilation (49% versus 35%) and NIV (7% versus 2%) decreased following the introduction of HFNCT.

  • Overall, 33% of infants underwent HFNCT during transport.

  • No adverse effects were noted among those who underwent HFNCT during transport.

Abraham et al.33 (2019) Retrospective study HFNCT 114 infants, of which 50% had bronchiolitis
  • No adverse events were observed during transport.

  • The method of respiratory support was changed to NIV (CPAP) before transport in 3% of patients.

  • Post-transport, 23% of patients required escalation of respiratory support.

Fleming et al.34 (2012) Retrospective study NIV (CPAP) 54 infants with suspected bronchiolitis
  • No adverse events were noted during transport.

  • However, 10% required intubation within 24 hours of transport.

Resnick and Sokol35 (2010) Retrospective study NIV (CPAP) 369 neonates aged ≥32 gestational weeks with acute respiratory distress
  • During the two-year study period, CPAP use increased from 33% to 59%.

  • Overall, 13% of the neonates required intubation within 24 hours of transport, likely due to higher initial oxygen requirements.

  • There was no significant morbidity or mortality.

Baird et al.36 (2009) Retrospective study NIV (CPAP and BPAP) 25 children and teenagers aged ≤18 years
  • Overall, 64% and 36% of patients were transported on CPAP and BPAP, respectively.

  • No adverse events were observed during transport.

  • However, 35% of patients required intubation within 84 hours of transport.

Millán et al.37 (2017) Prospective observational study Invasive ventilation, NIV (CPAP) or OCN 288 children aged ≤17 months with acute respiratory failure, of which 58% had bronchiolitis
  • Overall, 19%, 37% and 44% of patients were transported on invasive ventilation, CPAP and OCN, respectively.

  • Minor adverse events (i.e. intolerance to the interface) were observed in 3% of patients.

  • One patient required intubation during transport.

Cheema et al.38 (2018) Systematic review NIV (CPAP) and HFNCT 858 neonates and children
  • The rate of minor adverse events was 1–4%.

  • Only 0.4% of patients required intubation or escalation of support during transfer.

  • Overall, 10% needed intubation within 24 hours of transfer.

  • The odds of intubation within 24 hours were higher for patients on CPAP compared to those on HFNCT.

NIV = noninvasive ventilation; HFNCT = high-flow nasal cannulae therapy; CPAP = continuous positive airway pressure; BPAP = bilevel positive airway pressure; OCN = oxygen cannula/nebulisation.