Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 20;157:103123. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103123

Table 3.

Summary of the main pooled effect estimates (95 % CI) of studies comparing mHealth to control with data on both the treatment and the control arms stratified by 1) questionnaire type and when feasible 2) intervention type.

Questionnaire type Pooled effect estimate for HRQoL Studies reporting data on both arms; # of studies I2 %; P-heterogeneity
EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status (Overall)* Mean difference (95 % CI) 3.66 (-0.94, 8.26); n = 3 81.5%; p < 0.01
SF-36 (Overall)* Mean difference (95 % CI) 15.4 (5.30, 25.5); n = 3 0%; p: 0.49
FACT-G (Overall) Mean difference (95 % CI) 5.86 (0.77, 11.0); n = 1 NA
All combined (Overall) SMD (95 % CI) 0.28 (0.03, 0.53); n=6 61.4 %; p: 0.02
 EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status 0.27 (-0.06, 0.59); n = 3 80.7 %; p < 0.01
 SF-36 0.17 (-0.32, 0.66); n = 2 0%; p: 0.50
 FACT-G 0.54 (-0.14, 1.21); n = 1 NA
 p-interaction p-int:0.68

CI: confidence interval; EORTC QLQ-C30: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30; FACT-G: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General; HRQol: Health-related quality of life; NA: not applicable; SF-36: Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form; SMD: standardized mean difference.