Table 4.

Fgf20^−/+ vs. Fgf20^−/− differentially expressed genes from TRAPseq associated with FGF signaling.

Rank*	Ensembl ID	Gene	Enrichment^	Log2FC&	padj#
9	ENSMUSG00000019960	Dusp6	enriched	−0.79	<0.001
21	ENSMUSG00000004151	Etv1	depleted	−0.72	<0.001
36	ENSMUSG00000017724	Etv4	ENRICHED	−0.60	<0.01
23	ENSMUSG00000013089	Etv5	-	−0.55	<0.001
74	ENSMUSG00000031603	Fgf20	ENRICHED	−0.93	0.03
50	ENSMUSG00000040289	Hey1	ENRICHED	−0.55	0.01
5	ENSMUSG00000019789	Hey2	ENRICHED	−1.12	<0.001
106	ENSMUSG00000037211	Spry1	ENRICHED	−0.45	0.10
87	ENSMUSG00000024427	Spry4	depleted	−0.45	0.06

^*Rank determined by padj (lowest to highest).

^{^}Enrichment by TRAP: results of TRAP vs. pre-TRAP comparison in Fgf20^Cre/+;ROSA^fsTRAP/+ cochleae. Dash (−) indicates padj > 0.05; otherwise padj < 0.05. “enriched” indicates Log₂ Fold Change > 0; “ENRICHED” indicates Log₂ Fold Change > 1. “depleted” indicates Log₂ Fold Change < 0; “DEPLETED” indicates Log₂ Fold Change < −1.

^&Log₂ Fold Change of Fgf20^−/+ vs. Fgf20^−/− comparison.

^#Adjusted p-value of Fgf20^−/+ vs. Fgf20^−/− comparison.