Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 30;52(5):2188–2201. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01385-5

Table 1.

An overview of studies measuring lexical speed of processing with participants in the second year of life

Study N Participants Age of participants (in months) Number of trials Mean number of RT trials Range of RT Trials Time window for RT analysis (in ms) Mean RT (in ms)
Buckler, Oczak-Arsic, Siddiqui & Johnson (2017) - Experiment 1: Canadian accent condition 16 24 32 9.5 - 300–2300 657.85
Buckler, Oczak-Arsic, Siddiqui & Johnson (2017) - Experiment 1 Non-native accent condition 16 24 32 9.9 - 300–2300 774.48
Donnelly & Kidd (2020) 113 18 48* 14.2* 4–26* 300–1800 847.7*
Donnelly & Kidd (unpublished) 112* 21* 40* 13.63* 3–21* 300–1800 768.9*
Donnelly & Kidd (unpublished) 107* 24* 48* 11.91* 3–22* 300–1800 565.5*
Fernald & Hurtado (2006) - Experiment 1: Sentence frame 24 18 12 - - 367–1800 906
Fernald & Hurtado (2006) Experiment 1: Word in isolation 24 18 12 - - 367–1800 1034
Fernald & Hurtado (2006) Experiment 2: Sentence frame 24 18 12 - - 367–1800 861
Fernald & Hurtado (2006) Experiment 2: Words with attention cue 24 18 12 - - 367–1800 1015
Fernald & Marchman (2012) - Typically developing children 46 18 64 19.8 4–31 300–1800 789.1
Fernald & Marchman (2012) - Late talkers 36 18 64 18.9 3–32 300–1800 865.4
Fernald, Pinto, Swingley, Weinberg & McRoberts. (1998) 24 15 8 4.04* - 200–2000* 995
Fernald, Pinto, Swingley, Weinberg & McRoberts. (1998) 24 18 8 4.91* - 200–2000* 827
Fernald, Pinto, Swingley, Weinberg & McRoberts. (1998) 24 24 8 4.75* - 200–2000* 679
Fernald, Marchman & Weisleder (2013) - High SES 47* 18 32 8.8* 2–16* 300–1800 746
Fernald, Marchman & Weisleder (2013) - Low SES 47* 18 32 8.8* 2–16* 300–1800 947
Fernald, Marchman & Weisleder (2013) - High SES 48 24 16 4.97* 2–10* 300–1800 666
Fernald, Marchman & Weisleder (2013) - Low SES 48 24 16 4.97* 2–10* 300–1800 802
Fernald, Perfors & Marchman (2006) 49* 15 24 5.77* 2–14* 300–1800 981
Fernald, Perfors & Marchman (2006) 44* 18 24 4.55* 2 – 9* 300–1800 962
Fernald, Perfors & Marchman (2006) 52* 21 24 6.48* 2–12* 300–1800 802
Fernald, Perfors & Marchman (2006) 57* 25 24 10.21* 2–17* 300–1800 771
Fernald, Swingley & Pinto (2001) - Experiment 1: Whole word condition 32 21 8 4.6* (across both age groups and conditions) - 367–2000* 749.81
Fernald, Swingley & Pinto (2001) - Experiment 2: Whole word condition 32 18 8 4.6* (across both age groups and conditions) - 367–2000* 943.31
Hurtado, Marchman & Fernald (2007) 18 18 16 6.3 2–13 367–1800 1084.9
Hurtado, Marchman & Fernald (2007) 15 24 16 6.3 2–13 367–1800 960 (estimate)
Hurtado, Marchman & Fernald (2007) 16 30 16 6.3 2–13 367–1800 851.8
Hurtado, Marchman & Fernald (2008) 27 18 32 8 2–18 300–1800 -
Hurtado, Marchman & Fernald (2008) 27 24 36 13 7–21 300–1800 -
Lany (2018) - Experiment 1 35 17 40 10 2–20 300–1800 839.8
Lany (2018) - Experiment 1 31 30 40 10 3–21 300–1800 617.9
Lany (2018) - Experiment 2 34 30 40 10 3–17 300–1800 671
Lany, Giglio & Oswald (2018a) - Easy words condition 45 12 16 2.76 2–6 300–1800 946.85
Lany, Giglio & Oswald (2018b) - Hard words condition 36 12 16 2.82 2–8 300–1800 957.92
Lany, Giglio & Oswald (2018a) 34 15–19 24 4.65 2–15 300–1800 910.82
Lany, Shoaib, Thompson & Estes (2018b) – Experiment 1 38 15–16 24 - - 367–2200 1003.8
Lany, Shoaib, Thompson & Estes (2018b) – Experiment 2 30 15–15.9 24 - - 367–2200 1052.7
Marchman et al. (2019) - Full term born children 63 18 64 19.8 2–32 300–1800 728
Marchman et al. (2019) - Preterm born children 69 18 64 15.7 2–33 300–1800 809
Peter et al. (2019) 80 19 64 11.95 2–27 300–1800 729.94
Peter et al. (2019) 73 25 60 10.41 2–24 300–1800 675.73
Peter et al. (2019) 74 31 64 10.48 2–24 300–1800 639.14
Swingley & Aslin (2000) - Correct pronunciation condition 56 18–23 12 7.26* (across both conditions) - 367–2000* 718
Swingley & Aslin (2002) - Correct pronunciation condition 50* 15 24 5.86* (across both conditions) - 367–2000* 922
Swingley & Fernald (2002) - Experiment 1 24 24 26* (including filler trials)

11.04*

(across conditions)

- 367–2000* 808 (baseline trials)
Swingley & Fernald (2002) - Experiment 2 24* 24 28* (including filler trials) 10.79* (across conditions) - 367–2000* 760 (baseline trials)
Swingley & Fernald (2002) - Experiment 3 24* 24 26* (including filler trials) 10.04* (across conditions) - 367–2000* -
Swingley, Pinto & Fernald (1999) - Experiment 1 32 24 16* 5.59* - 200–2000* 785
Swingley, Pinto & Fernald (1999) - Experiment 2 32 24 16* 5.56* - 200–2000* 746
Weisleder & Fernald (2013) 28* 19 32 9.21* 3–18* 300–1800 991.97*
Weisleder & Fernald (2013) 29 24 36 12.38* 4–18* 300–1800 814.74*
Zangl, Klarman, Thal, Fernald & Bates (2005) - Unaltered speech condition 95 12–31 24 45% of trials were distractor initial - 625–2000 1144

Note: Information was extracted from the publications, unless marked with *, in which case the authors provided data directly