Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 20;10:17820. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74568-x

Table 2.

Viral kinetic parameters and predicted time to cure of patients with shortened treatment.

Pt # Sex Age(yr) Weight(kg) HCV Gt Fib DAA regimen V0* c (d-1) ε δ (d-1) Predicted TTC (d) Actual DAA duration(w)
1 M 54 66 1b F2 SOF/VEL 6.0 4.2 0.9999 0.25 59 10
2 M 61 104 1b F3 ELB/GRZ 5.9 11.0 0.9995 0.35 46 8
3** M 63 84 3a F0-1 SOF/VEL 6.3 5.6 0.9988 0.5 36 6
4 F 29 55 1b F0 SOF/LED 6.1 5.2 0.9993 0.25 55 8
5 M 59 71 3 F3 SOF/VEL 5.3 ND ND ND ND 6
6 F 31 46 1B F0-1 ELB/GRZ 5.2 5.7 0.9994 0.33 43 8
7 F 37 56 1A F1 ELB/GRZ 6.3 11.2 0.9990 0.45 55 8
8 M 42 85 1B F0-1 SOF/LED 6.3 4.0 0.9994 0.34 53 8
9 F 65 60 3 F2 SOF/VEL 5.0 7.3 0.9929 0.29 53 8
10 M 35 64 3A F0-1 SOF/VEL 6.3 4.4 0.9993 0.41 44 8
11 F 67 80 1B F1 ELB/GRZ 5.2 3.3 0.9999 0.28 53 8

*V0, initial viral load (log IU/ml) was set during fitting based on each patient’s measured baseline HCV RNA; **, relapser; Fib, Fibrosis stage; Gt, genotype; DAA, direct-acting antiviral; SOF/VEL, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir; SOF/LED, sofosbuvir/ledipasvir; ELB/GRZ, elbasvir/grazoprevir; TTC, Time to cure; ND, not determined because viral load was < 10 IU/ml at day 2 of therapy.