Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cancer Educ. 2021 Dec;36(6):1163–1169. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01745-x

Table 2.

Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models for being within CRC screening guidelines among average-risk companions (n=156)

Within CRC Guidelines

Univariable OR (95% CI) Multivariable OR (95% CI)
Age 1.08 (1.02, 1.14)* 1.08 (1.00, 1.16)

Sex
Male ref ref
Female 2.28 (1.09, 4.78)* 1.52 (0.63, 3.70)

Race
Non-white ref ref
White 1.71 (0.74, 3.93) 2.13 (0.79, 5.77)

Education
Some college or less ref ref
College or more 2.98 (1.36, 6.54)* 2.55 (1.02, 6.41)*

Health Insurance
No ref ref
Yes 7.69 (1.82, 32.43)* 4.62 (0.95, 22.54)

Colonoscopy Perception a 3.00 (1.42, 6.35)* 3.22 (1.27, 8.17)*

CRC Screening Barriers b 0.46 (0.27, 0.79)* 0.53 (0.28, 1.01)

CRC Screening Knowledge c 1.07 (0.73, 1.58) -

CRC Screening Benefits d 1.50 (0.81, 2.77) -

Single-Item Literacy Screener 1.22 (0.69, 2.14)

Sample size includes participants with complete data across all variables of interest

*

p-value <0.05

a

Colonoscopy Perception: Averaging sum of colonoscopy response-efficacy and safety

b

Barriers: Averaging sum of perceived difficulty, discomfort, cost, and worry

c

Knowledge: Total number of correct answers

d

Benefits: Averaging sum of perceived effectiveness, protection, and family benefit

OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval, CRC = colorectal cancer