Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 7;14:568614. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.568614

TABLE 2.

Quantitative comparison of U-Net, RATS, PCNN, and SHERM for segmentations on mouse T2w RARE from Online dataset.

Methods Dice Jaccard PPV SEN Hausdorff (voxels)
U-Net 0.85 (0.01) 0.74 (0.01) 0.74 (0.01) 0.98 (0.00) 5.23 (0.37)
RATS 0.82 (0.01) 0.70 (0.01) 0.76 (0.01) 0.91 (0.01) 5.07 (0.31)
PCNN 0.79 (0.00) 0.65 (0.01) 0.76 (0.01) 0.83 (0.01) 7.07 (0.47)
SHERM 0.80 (0.01) 0.67 (0.01) 0.72 (0.01) 0.90 (0.01) 7.03 (0.41)
p-value (U-Net vs. RATS) <0.05 <0.05 N.S. <0.001 N.S.
p-value (U-Net vs. PCNN) <0.001 <0.001 N.S. <0.001 <0.005
p-value (U-Net vs. SHERM) <0.001 <0.001 N.S. <0.001 <0.005

The p-value indicates the result of two-tailed paired t-test comparison (best performance results in bold).