Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep;8(17):1059. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-1007a

Table 1. Characteristics of the included four studies.

Study Region Study participants Number of participants [male, female] Age, median [range] or mean ± SEM Intervention Reported outcome of interest Primary outcome of the original study
Frankwich [2012] (13) The USA ・BMI >30 kg/m2 24 [20, 4] PLA 54.5±1.7 Placebo vs. DOX 200 mg/day ×12 weeks HOMA-IR, body weight, rate of diarrhea, FPG, and all adverse events C-reactive protein and myeloperoxidase levels
・7.5%< HbA1c <10% DOX 55.3±1.9
Vizuete [2012] (26) The USA ・BMI >30 kg/m2 66 [18, 48] All 45 [18–62] Placebo vs. Rifaximin 1,100 mg/day ×20 days No outcome of interest was reported Weight loss
Reijnders [2016] (15) Netherlands ・BMI 25-35 kg/m2 57 [57, 0] PLA 60.9±1.7 AMOX 55.7±1.5 VANCO 60.6±1.5 Placebo vs. AMOX 1,500 mg/day ×7 days vs. VANCO 1,500 mg/day ×7 days HOMA-IR, rate of diarrhea, FPG, GLP-1, fecal SCFAs, and all adverse events Insulin sensitivity measured by using the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp technique
・HOMA-IR >2.2
・Two-h PG during 75 g OGTT 7.8-11.1 mmol/l and/or fasting PG ≥5.6 mmol/L
・Body weight stable for at least three months (±3 kg)
Balliu [2017] (28) The USA ・Overweight and obese individuals 18 (not reported] Not reported Placebo vs. DOX ×12 weeks No outcome of interest was reported The change in insulin sensitivity measured by both HOMA and the area under the curve for c-peptide during an OGTT

AMOX, amoxicillin; BMI, body mass index; DOX, doxycycline, GLP, glucagon-like peptide; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; PG, plasma glucose; RCT, randomized controlled trial; SD, standard deviation; SEM, standard error of mean; VANCO, vancomycin.