Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 21;265:113449. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113449

Table 3.

Sensitivity analysis: Average treatment effect of disability on stigma, depression and self-esteem and stigma on depression and self-esteem.

MODEL 1 Disability on Stigma ATT°(95%CI) MODEL 2 Disability on Depression ATT°(95%CI) MODEL 3 Disability on Self-esteem ATT°(95%CI) MODEL 4 Stigma on Depression ATT°(95%CI) MODEL 5 Stigma on Self-esteem ATT °(95%CI)
Kernel Matching
Sensitivity Analysis Model 1# 0.249(0.162–0.336) 3.278(2.007–4.550) −1.998(-2.878, −1.118) 4.586(2.805, 6.368) −1.589(-3.059, −0.120)
Sensitivity Analysis Model 2+ 0.148(0.079–0.218) 0.202(0.111–0.293) −0.226(-0.360, −0.092) 0.227(0.106, 0.348) −0.136(-0.341, 0.068)

Note: °Average Treatment Effect on the Treated estimated from sensitivity analysis with kernel matching.#Model 1 estimated ATT by using the continuous outcome with categorical covariates age in quantile group (18–41, 42–60, 61–89), gender (male and female), education (lower than secondary, secondary schooling and higher, secondary schooling and higher), work (unemployed and employed) marital status (single, married, divorced), welfare index (20% poorest, 60% middle, 20% richest).+Model 2 estimated ATT by using binary outcomes and binary covariates except age (continuous variable) included Female (ref=Male), No education (ref=Education), Married (ref=Unmarried), Work (ref=Employed), 20% Richest (ref=80%non-richest).