Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 21;11:81. doi: 10.1186/s13229-020-00371-0

Table 4.

Group performance at the CFPT

N Error score SD Range
CFPT upright AUT 62

51.97

95% CI [45.61, 58.32]

25.02

95% CI [21.26, 30.41]

18–116
AUT-NP 41

44.44

95% CI [37.19, 51.69]

22.97

95% CI [18.86, 29.39]

20–96
AUT-P 21

66.67

95% CI [56.37, 76.96]

22.61

95% CI [17.30, 32.65]

18–116
CFPT inverted AUT 62

73.94

95% CI [69.97, 77.90]

15.61

95% CI [13.27, 18.98]

36–102
AUT-NP 41

71.61

95% CI [66.41, 76.81]

16.48

95% CI [13.53, 21.08]

36–100
AUT-P 21

78.48

95% CI [72.58, 84.38]

12.96

95% CI [9.82, 18.72]

50–102
CFPT inversion effect (Inv-Up)
AUT-NP 41

27.17

95% CI [21.88, 32.47]

16.77 − 10–58
AUT-P 21

11.81

95% CI [2.99, 20.62]

19.37 − 32–44
Controls from Bowles et al. 2009 118 26.43 14.41

CFPT Cambridge Face Perception Test, AUT autistic participants, P prosopagnosic, NP nonprosopagnosic, SD standard deviation, CI confidence interval