Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 21;20:1589. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09695-1

Table 2.

Psychometric properties of the measures used in this study

Reliability Item discrimination of each measure a Model fit of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) d
α t b p χ2 df CFI RMSEA 90%CI SRMR
1. Knowledge about the COVID-19 0.91 [−63.90, −45.57] < 0.001 386.87 24 0.99 0.06 [0.052, 0.062] 0.02
2. Perceived severity 0.84 [−65.61, −52.08] < 0.001 62.06 3 1.00 0.07 [0.052, 0.080] 0.02
3. Perceived controllability 0.91 [−93.59, −49.78] < 0.001 135.78 17 1.00 0.04 [0.033, 0.045] 0.01
4. Emotional and behavioural reactions
 Negative emotion 0.91 [−59.46, −34.28] < 0.001 192.48 8 0.99 0.07 [0.062, 0.080] 0.02
 Positive emotion 0.97 [− 115.87, − 114.46] < 0.001 e e e e e e
 Sleep problem 0.91 [−42.78, −29.82] < 0.001 24.11 2 0.99 0.05 [0.033, 0.067] 0.01
 Aggression 0.90 [−60.09, −22.67] < 0.001 f f f f f f
 Substance use 0.91 [−27.75, −15.85] < 0.001 f f f f f f
 Mobile phone use −101.18 c < 0.001 f f f f f f
5. Social participation 0.79 [− 70.45, −47.41] < 0.001 23.71 3 1.00 0.04 [0.025, 0.054] 0.01
6. Precautionary behaviour 0.92 [−55.19, −33.11] < 0.001 2950.96 121 0.96 0.07 [0.069, 0.073] 0.08

a: The ability of each item in a measure/dimension to differentiate the high (top 27%) and the low (bottom 27%) total score of that measure/dimension was examined

b: T-values of the comparison between the high and the low total score groups in the item discrimination tests are presented as a range. For instance, the measure of “Knowledge about the COVID-19” consists of 11 items; the range represents the t values of the comparison for these 11 items

c: The “mobile phone use” dimension has only 1 item and thus no range is presented

d: Some residuals are correlated when we fit the CFA models for some measures/dimensions

e: This dimension has 3 items and thus the CFA model is a saturated model (i.e., χ2 = 0.00, df = 0.00, CFI = 1.00, RMSEA and SRMR = 0.00)

f: Each of these dimensions has less than 3 items and thus CFA is not applicable