Table 3.
Excess costs* (million) | QALY loss† | NML‡ (million) | |
Male | |||
Age 18–19 | US$0.3 | 30 | US$1.0 |
Age 20–24 | US$0.7 | 371 | US$9.2 |
Age 25–29 | US$2.8 | 2598 | US$62.7 |
Age 30–34 | US$2.2 | 1395 | US$34.4 |
Age 35–39 | US$4.0 | 2795 | US$68.4 |
Age 40–44 | US$4.5 | 2942 | US$72.3 |
Age 45–49 | US$6.5 | 3043 | US$76.7 |
Age 50–54 | US$8.3 | 2610 | US$68.5 |
Age 55–59 | US$6.1 | 3881 | US$95.6 |
Age 60–64 | US$12.5 | 4160 | US$108.4 |
Age 65–69 | US$5.2 | 4697 | US$113.5 |
Age 70–74 | US$7.0 | 4774 | US$117.0 |
Age 75–79 | US$12.2 | 4730 | US$121.3 |
Age 80–84 | US$10.1 | 4699 | US$118.5 |
Age 85–89 | US$5.4 | 1461 | US$39.1 |
Male total | US$87.9 | 44 186 | US$1106.4 |
Female | |||
Age 18–19 | US$0.1 | 1 | US$0.1 |
Age 20–24 | US$0.4 | 175 | US$4.4 |
Age 25–29 | US$0.6 | 246 | US$6.3 |
Age 30–34 | US$0.7 | 415 | US$10.3 |
Age 35–39 | US$0.6 | 359 | US$8.9 |
Age 40–44 | US$0.7 | 581 | US$14.1 |
Age 45–49 | US$1.9 | 701 | US$18.1 |
Age 50–54 | US$4.5 | 3215 | US$78.6 |
Age 55–59 | US$8.0 | 4458 | US$110.7 |
Age 60–64 | US$5.7 | 4169 | US$101.8 |
Age 65–69 | US$7.9 | 4837 | US$119.4 |
Age 70–74 | US$8.3 | 5610 | US$137.6 |
Age 75–79 | US$7.2 | 9891 | US$235.2 |
Age 80–84 | US$6.4 | 7853 | US$187.4 |
Age 85–89 | US$7.0 | 5878 | US$142.5 |
Female total | US$60.1 | 48 388 | US$1175.4 |
Total | US$147.9 | 92 574 | US$2281.8 |
*Excess costs were the difference between the costs of the population (or the population in a certain age group) when exposed to the PM2.5 concentration of 105 µg/m3 and the costs of the same population when exposed to the PM2.5 concentration of 35 µg/m3.
†QALY loss was the difference between the QALYs of the population (or the population in a certain age group) when exposed to the PM2.5 concentration of 35 µg/m3 and the QALYs of the same population when exposed to the PM2.5 concentration of 105 µg/m3.
‡NML was the sum of excess costs and monetised QALY loss.
NML, net monetary loss; PM, particulate matter; QALY, quality-adjusted life-years.