Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Comp Eff Res. 2019 Apr 5;8(6):441–453. doi: 10.2217/cer-2018-0129

Table A1.

Selected activities of patient early engagement in research proposal development for the RadComp study.

Pre-engagement activity Impact
Seven conference calls with individual patients and investigators
  • Refined research question to breast and lung cancer with focus on HRQOL and major cardiovascular events

  • Enfranchised patients, trustworthiness of study

One focus group with patients and patient advocates
  • Refined HRQOL metrics and outcomes

  • Refined short- and long-term end points

  • Enfranchised patients, trustworthiness of study

Multi-stakeholder conference at the National Cancer Institute
  • Confirmed importance of HRQOL and major cardiovascular events, and NIH’s particular interest in cardiotoxicity of cancer treatments

  • Removed registry from study design based on NCI Radiation Research Branch Chief feedback

  • Feedback from RADCOMP providers, manufacturers, professional societies and payers

Conference calls with the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services
  • CMS attended multistakeholder conference at NCI

  • CMS stated specific attention to coverage and evidence approaches for proton therapy across malignancies

Patient engagement infrastructure: weekly calls with patient advisors
  • Discussed data capture and transparency; development of patient-friendly ‘give backs’; and dissemination strategies

The PATIENTS Program External Advisory Board Calls
  • Feedback regarding appropriate time commitment and compensation for Stakeholder Advisory Committee members

CMS: Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services; HRQOL: Health-related quality of life; NCI: National Cancer Institute.