. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Feb 9;77:102696. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102696

Table 3.

Multivariable multinomial logistic regression analyses of factors associated with membership in suboptimal OAT engagement groups (versus membership in the “Consistently High” OAT engagement group) among OAT initiators, Vancouver, British Columbia, 2005–2018.

	OAT engagement trajectory groups^b
	Consistently low		Increasing		Decreasing
	AOR	95% CI	AOR	95% CI	AOR	95% CI
OAT initiation ≥ 2014	1.61	0.86, 3.01	0.75	0.37, 1.51	0.57	0.23, 1.41
Employment^a	2.01	1.02, 3.93^c	1.97	1.02, 3.81^c	2.60	1.25, 5.43^c

OAT, opioid agonist therapy; AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Refers to the 6-month period prior to the baseline interview.

Only the variables included in the final multivariable model are presented.

P < 0.05.