Table 2.
Demographic characteristics of CHAP participants, overall and by study arm.
Intervention n (%) (n=90) | Control n (%) (n=90) | Total n (%) (n=180) | |
---|---|---|---|
Language | |||
Only Aymara | 1 (1.1%) | 3 (3.3%) | 4 (2.2%) |
Aymara/Quechua + Spanish | 89 (98.9%) | 87 (96.7%) | 176 (97.8%) |
Married or Cohabitating | 78 (86.7%) | 74 (82.2%) | 152 (84.4%) |
Participant Occupation: Fanner | 78 (86.7%) | 77 (85.6%) | 155 (86.1%) |
Husband Occupation: Fanner* | 63 (80.8%) | 55 (74.3%) | 118(77.6%) |
Wealth Quintile | |||
Poorest | 51 (56.7%) | 50 (55.6%) | 101 (56.1%) |
Poor | 32 (35.6%) | 37(41.1%) | 69 (38.3%) |
Middle | 7 (7.8%) | 3 (3.3%) | 10 (5.6%) |
Monthly Income | |||
0-99 soles | 20 (22.2%) | 25 (27.8%) | 45 (25%) |
100–249 soles | 33 (36.7%) | 38 (42.2%) | 71 (39.4%) |
250-499 soles | 34 (37.8%) | 26 (28.9%) | 60 (33.3%) |
500 or more soles | 3 (3.3%) | 1 (1.1%) | 4 (2.2%) |
Owned LPG at baseline | 64 (71.1%) | 68 (75.6%) | 132(73.3%) |
Electricity in household | 85 (94.4%) | 90(100%) | 175 (97.2%) |
Previously participated in FISE | 42 (46.7%) | 46 (51.1%) | 88 (48.9%) |
Household owns a cell phone | 81 (90.0%) | 81 (90.0%) | 162 (90.0%) |
Owns pig(s) | 52 (57.8%) | 54 (60.0%) | 107 (59.4%) |
Ow ns dog(s) | 66 (73.3%) | 57 (63.3%) | 123 (68.3%) |
Owns cattle | 84 (93.3%) | 80 (88.9%) | 164(91.1%) |
Owns sheep | 80 (88.9%) | 85 (94.4%) | 165 (91.7%) |
Owns donkeys or horses | 19(21.2%) | 17 (18.9%) | 36 (20.0%) |
Owns llamas or alpacas | 23 (25.6%) | 21 (23.3%) | 44 (24.4%) |
Age** | 48.7 ± 9.1. | 47.9 ± 11.1, | 48.3 ± 10.1. |
(25.0–64.4) | (25.3–64.8) | (25.0–64.8) | |
Years of Education** | 6.1 ± 3.4, | 6.4 ± 3.3, | 6.2 ± 3.3, |
(0-11) | (0-12) | (0-12) | |
Number of Household | 3.8 ± 1.7, | 3.6 ± 1.5, | 3.7 ± 1.6. |
Members** | (1–9) | (1–7) | (1–9) |
Denominator is the number of married or cohabitating participants
Age, education, and number of household members are reported as mean ± SD, (range)