Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 20;55(11):1397–1413. doi: 10.1007/s00127-020-01937-2

Table 4.

Key themes on facilitators in help-seeking

Key facilitator themes Studies on local Filipinos (n = 4) Studies on overseas Filipinos (n = 11) Total (n = 15)
(A) Systemic and economic facilitators
 1. Financial capacity (e.g., higher socio-economic status, employment status, medical insurance, higher income) 1 4 5 (33%)
 2. Immigration/Residency status (e.g., nativity status, being US-born Filipino American, later-generation immigrants) N/A 3 3 (20%)
 3. Accessibility of mental health services (e.g., technological access, presence of technical infrastructure, perception of ease of use, familiarity with health care services) 0 2 2 (13%)
(B) Socio-cultural facilitators
 1. Language proficiency (e.g., bilingualism, proficiency of the language of host culture) 0 4 4 (27%)
 2. Lower adherence to Asian cultural values (e.g., higher levels of acculturation/assimilation) 0 3 3 (20%)
 3. Higher level of spirituality 0 2 2 (13%)
(C) Psycho-social facilitators
 1. Perception of distress (e.g., awareness of mental health need; higher severity of mental health problems) 2 5 7 (47%)
 2. Influence of social support (presence/absence of family and friends, witnessing friends seeking help, having supportive friends and family who encourage help-seeking, others taking the initiative to help) 2 4 6 (40%)
 3. Self-stigma tolerance (e.g., concern for loss of face, lower/higher tolerance of stigma) 1 3 4 (27%)
 4. Previous experience in help-seeking (e.g., positive experience with mental health professionals, establishing rapport with mental health providers) 2 2 4 (27%)
 5. Higher awareness of mental health issues 2 0 2 (13%)
 6. Sense of anonymity 1 1 2 (13%)