Table 2.
Item | Yes/noa | |
---|---|---|
1 | The study addressed an appropriate and clearly focused question. | |
2 | Group assignment was randomized. | |
3 | The sample size was justified by a power calculation. | |
4 | Investigators were blinded to patients' group assignment. | |
5 | Patients were blinded to group assignment. | |
6 | Groups were similar at the start of the trial. | |
7 | The only difference between groups was the treatment of interest. | |
8 | Outcomes were measured in a standard, valid, and reliable way. | |
9 | A power calculation was used and required sample size attained. | |
10 | An intention to treat analysis was performed. | |
Total scoreb |
Rating: “Yes” = 1; “No” or unable to tell from the article = 0.
Scoring—sum of items as follows: 9–10 = high quality, low risk of bias; 6–8 = acceptable quality, moderate risk of bias; <6 = low quality, high risk of bias.