Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 21;40(10):BSR20202544. doi: 10.1042/BSR20202544

Table 2. Comparison of clinical characteristics of patients with different prognosis groups.

Characteristics Total Good curative effect Poor curative effect P-value
Number 705 546 (77.45%) 159 (22.55%)
Continuous variables with normal distribution
Age 45.02 ± 11.46 44.87 ± 10.86 45.53 ± 13.36 0.573
Hg 139.61 ± 16.04 139.44 ± 16.36 140.19 ± 14.92 0.609
ALB 46.20 ± 3.17 46.26 ± 3.27 45.97 ± 2.77 0.279
PLT 261.95 ± 63.81 265.36 ± 63.62 251.20 ± 63.25 0.0141
PDW 12.32 ± 1.65 12.20 ± 2.12 12.48 ± 2.06 0.135
MPV 10.49 ± 0.75 10.47 ± 0.92 10.58 ± 0.91 0.177
RDW 13.37 ± 2.73 13.59 ± 5.72 13.11 ± 1.26 0.293
BMI 25.44 ± 3.19 25.45 ± 5.04 25.42 ± 4.21 0.945
Continuous variables with skewed distribution
NEUT 3.99 (3.00–5.23) 3.85 (2.95–3.85) 4.47 (3.16–5.83) 0.0081
LBC 2.02 (1.57–2.92) 1.95 (1.54–2.65) 2.06 (1.51–6.15) 0.119
PCT 0.28 (0.24–0.33) 0.28 (0.24–0.33) 0.29 (0.23–0.33) 0.159
NLR 2.11 (1.56–2.31) 2.11 (1.54–3.32) 2.11 (1.71–2.19) 0.448
Categorical variables
Gender 0.781
Male 211 162 (76.8%) 49 (23.2%)
Female 494 384 (77.7%) 110 (22.3%)
Variants 0.674
Yes 48 36 (75.0%) 12 (25.0%)
No 657 510 (77.6%) 147 (22.4%)
PLT subgroups 0.0011
1 550 411 (74.7%) 139 (25.3%)
2 155 135 (87.1%) 20 (12.9%)
NLR subgroups 0.069
1 505 382 (75.6%) 123 (24.4%)
2 200 164 (82.0%) 36 (18.0%)
T stage 0.1102
1a 207 170 (82.1%) 37 (17.9%)
1b 273 210 (76.9%) 63 (23.1%)
2 51 42 (82.4%) 9 (17.6%)
3 99 71 (71.7%) 28 (28.3%)
4a 58 43 (74.1%) 15 (25.9%)
4b 17 10 (58.8%) 7 (41.2%)
N stage 0.168
0 99 82 (82.8%) 17 (17.2%)
1a 369 289 (78.3%) 80 (21.7%)
1b 237 175 (73.8%) 62 (26.2%)
COR-BMI 0.0471,2
1 9 6 (66.7%) 3 (33.3%) 0.3862,3
2 371 300 (80.9%) 71 (19.1%) 0.7033,4
3 325 240 (73.8%) 85 (26.2%) 0.0275

3,4,5Adjusted the significance level according to Bonferroni’s method. P<0.017 is considered significant.

1

P<0.05.

2

Fisher’s exact test.

3

Differences between COR-BMI 1 and 2.

4

Differences between COR-BMI 1 and 3.

5

Differences between COR-BMI 2 and 3.