Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 7;22(10):e17499. doi: 10.2196/17499

Table 10.

Results of the moderating effect of income (low income vs high income).

Hypothesis # Hypothesized path Low incomea High incomeb P value for chi-square difference test


Standardized estimate (β) P value Standardized estimate (β) P value
H4 PPSc→PEd .38 <.001 .39 <.001 .92
H5 PPS→BIe .24 <.001 .23 <.001 .81
H10 EEf→PE .18 <.001 .24 .01 .60
H11 EE→BI .14 <.001 .09 .13 .53
H15 SIg→PE .14 .006 .19 .054 .45
H21 FCsh→PE .22 <.001 −.11 .29 .06
H22 FCs→BI .08 .09 .03 .63 .96
H23 FCs→UBi .42 <.001 .07 .40 .03
H27 PE→BI .53 <.001 .66 <.001 .12
H29 BI→UB .43 <.001 .61 <.001 .008

aLow income: <US $25,000.

bHigh income: ≥US $51,000.

cPPS: perceived privacy and security.

dPE: performance expectancy.

eBI: behavioral intention.

fEE: effort expectancy.

gSI: social influence.

hFC: facilitating condition.

iUB: use behavior.