Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 7;22(10):e17499. doi: 10.2196/17499

Table 9.

Results of the moderating effect of income (low income vs middle income).

Hypothesis # Hypothesized path Low incomea Middle incomeb P value for chi-square difference test


Standardized estimate (β) P value Standardized estimate (β) P value
H4 PPSc→PEd .38 <.001 .40 <.001 .71
H5 PPS→BIe .24 <.001 .27 <.001 .91
H10 EEf→PE .18 <.001 .32 <.001 .07
H11 EE→BI .14 <.001 .21 <.001 .41
H15 SIg→PE .14 .006 .13 .07 .98
H21 FCsh→PE .22 <.001 .06 .40 .43
H22 FCs→BI .08 .09 .06 .31 .96
H23 FCs→UBi .42 <.001 .23 <.001 .04
H27 PE→BI .53 <.001 .52 <.001 .40
H29 BI→UB .43 <.001 .41 <.001 .87

aLow income: <US $25,000.

bMedium income: US $25,000-US $50,999.

cPPS: perceived privacy and security.

dPE: performance expectancy.

eBI: behavioral intention.

fEE: effort expectancy.

gSI: social influence.

hFC: facilitating condition.

iUB: use behavior.