Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 27;7(20):2001572. doi: 10.1002/advs.202001572

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Chromosomal structural rearrangement during the ESC differentiation (upper) and the IMR90 reprogramming (lower). A) Differences and hierarchical clustering of contact probability maps of the chromosome among each time frame t = I, J during differentiation varied by total, local (<2 Mb) and non‐local (>2 Mb) contact ranges. The contact map difference ΔP I, J is calculated by: i,j|Pi,jt=IPi,jt=J|/i,jPi,jt=I, where Pi,jt=I(J) is the contact probability between chromosomal loci i and j at the differentiation time t = I or J. ΔP I, J is further normalized for achieving a better visualization. B) Reduced 7 stages (“D1”–“D7”) for the differentiation process based on the combination and comparison of the hierarchical clustering trees of local and non‐local ΔP I, J established in (A). The chromosome within one stage thus possesses a relatively similar contact probability map. C) The change of the contact probability P(s) versus genomic distance s in the chromosome during differentiation with the 7 stages indicated at the bottom. D) Hi‐C heat (contact probability) maps of chromosome for the 7 stages during differentiation. E) Representative structures of the chromosome for the 7 stages during differentiation. (F–J) are similar with (A–E) except for the process of IMR90 reprogramming to ESC. Another reduced 7 stages during the reprogramming (“R1”‐“R7”) are determined in (G).