Table 2.

Definitions of inductive analysis categories.

Categories	Definitions
Infrastructure	Material and resources needed for implementation.
Prevention culture	Identification by public agency administrators, the professionals and institutions that shares values, objectives, and methodologies of SFP 10–14, which may be the result of experience with previous iterations or another experience in prevention.
Financial resources	The capital needed to implement SFP 10–14.
Municipal management	Management actions related to the management of people in their activities, financial resources, and the intersectoral policy.
Group facilitators’ working conditions	Aspects of workload, time availability, number of people available to perform required activities, work accumulation, sensation of job instability, and employment precarity.
Institutional disruption	Refers to the period of political instability in 2015 that culminated in 2016 with the impeachment of President Dilma Rousseff and her removal from the Presidency of the Republic.
Intersectorality	Coordination via agreement among various social public policies aiming to implement the program.
Corruption	Diversion of funds.
Elections	Political agreements and campaign support during the election period, August through October, every even numbered year in the municipalities.
Awareness of hierarchical flow	Understanding that awareness occurs according to hierarchical flows of power, in which a higher-level manager is responsible for raising awareness of lower-level managers.
Federal supervision	Decisions concerning SFP 10–14 implementation logistics in the municipality together with federal and municipal service leaders, including the provision of implementation kits and the hiring of federal trainers.
Aggregate value of SFP 10–14	Benefits gained from experience in program implementation.
Local peculiarities	Strikes and holidays occurring during the implementation.
Selection of public service	Strategies used by federal trainers in selecting where to implement SFP 10–14.
Selection of families	The criteria established for selecting families to participate in the program.
Group facilitator training methodology	Strategies and methodologies used to train program facilitators.
Approach for inviting families	Strategies used to disseminate the program and information offered to families invited to participate in SFP 10–14.
Family maintenance strategies	Strategies used in the awareness-raising and recruitment meetings and weekly sessions to boost family adherence.
Federal support and monitoring in the implementation	Operational support by federal trainers for group facilitators during the SFP implementation
Planning	Holding weekly planning meetings during the SFP 10–14 implementation, where activities to be carried out with families are discussed, materials for implementation organized, and the best session management strategies verified.
Compatibility of meeting and family schedules	Reconciliation of session times between professionals and families according to availability of both groups.
Perception of effects on families	The perception of positive effects on the families as an essential element for motivation of the program facilitator.
Prior relationship between service and community	The closeness of the relationship between the service implementing the program and the individuals from the community who constitute the SFP 10–14 target audience.
Awareness-raising of public agency administrator	Information provided by federal trainers to public agency administrators about the program and strategies used by trainers to mobilize them in favor of implementing SFP 10–14.
Awareness-raising of group facilitators	Information provided by federal trainers, public agency administrators, or program multipliers to group facilitators aiming to mobilize them in favor of implementing SFP 10–14.
Team training awareness-raising	The understanding that professionals need to receive information about the real complexity of implementing SFP 10–14 before going through the facilitator team training.
Adherence of professionals	Engagement of public agency administrators, as well as health care, education, and social service professionals in the SFP 10–14 implementation and the quality of their participation in program delivery.
Adherence of institutions	Engagement by institutions as a whole, not the individuals comprising them, whether departments of education or health care, or other government agencies.
Professionals’ skills	Professionals with attitudes and actions that exceed expectations regarding the exercise of their function and that favor the implementation.
Relationships between professionals	Relationship and communication quality between professionals involved in the SFP 10–14 implementation process.