Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2020 Jul 15;583(7817):585–589. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2503-6

Extended Data Figure 3. Description of HSC subclusters.

Extended Data Figure 3.

a, SPRING plot showing the localization of the four reproducible HSC subclusters, HSC1–4. The plot is representative of one of three experiments with similar results. b, Marker gene expression for HSC subclusters. c, Violin plots showing the values for output activity, Mk-bias, and the scores of different HSC behaviour signatures. Violin plots show all the data (min-to-max) and are representative from one of 3 independent experiments (nHSC1=2206, nHSC2=577, nHSC3=1794, nHSC4=649). DPA results (p-values) are indicated for each HSC cluster in order from HSC1 to HSC4. Low-output: 0.0023, 0.0051, <0.0001, 0.0114. High-output: <0.0001, 0.3883, <0.0001, 0.0006. Mk-bias: 0.0002, 0.0172, 0.0516, 0.0182. Multilineage: 0.2257, 0.0763, 0.4374, 0.1977. d, SPRING plot showing distribution of native LT-HSCs (n=1) mapped by approximate nearest neighbors (see Methods). e, Cluster distribution of native LT-HSCs (blue dots) compared to transplant HSCs (black dots). Mean±S.D., n=3. Chi-square test (transplant HSCs vs. native LT-HSCs), pexp1=10−8, p exp2=0.0007, p exp3=0.0483.