Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Sex Res. 2011 Dec 29;50(2):164–177. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2011.636845

Table 7.

Correlations among Couple Efficacy Subscales and Validation Measures

Validation Measure Couple efficacy-Joint Couple efficacy-Comm Couple efficacy-Plan

Relationship Satisfaction .48*** .46*** .50***
Relationship Happiness .40*** .44*** .43***
Communal Confidence .17*** .22*** .21***
Conflict Style −.05 −.14** −.08
Communication Style .38*** .37*** .40***
Agreement .30*** .24*** .24***
Broke agreement −.23*** −.17*** −.19***
Attitudes Agreements .34*** .37*** .35***
HIV-Social Support (−) .46*** .40*** .42***
HIV-Social Support (+)a .59*** .47*** .55***
Personal stigma .02 .06 .05
Local stigma .01 .00 .00
UAI-main partner −.03 −.01 −.02
UAI-casual −.24*** −.19*** −.23***
HIV status −.15*** −.10* −.12**
Education level −.03 −.07 −.06

Note: Values in boldface type denote >.40. Couple Efficacy= Couple Efficacy to Reduce HIV Threat scale; Joint=joint effort; Comm.=communication; Plan=planning and decision-making; UAI=unprotected anal intercourse.

a

n=56

*

p<.05

**

p<.01

***

p<.001