Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 22.
Published in final edited form as: Metrologia. 2017;54(1A):https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/54/1a/06011.

Table 3:

The NIST uncertainty budgets for the IC activity measurement of the 18F and 64Cu ampoules (May 2016)

Uncertainty contributions due to Evaluation method 18F 64Cu
Relative std uncert. × 104 Comments Relative std uncert. × 104 Comments
Ampoule to RRS2 ratio A 2 Average std deviation, 90 meas. of 18F, 108 meas. of RRS 50 2 Average std deviation, 82 or 90 meas. of 64Cu on each of the two ampoules, 108 meas. of RRS 50
Activity estimation A 0.5 Std deviation of the estimation in each of two ampoules 0.5 Std deviation of the estimation in each of two ampoules
RRS ratio, 1000 to 50 B 7 Uncertainty attending the ratio between RRS 1000, used in the calib. of the IC, and RRS 50, used in this meas. - Not required; both the calibration and this meas. used RRS 50.
Weighing B 7 Mass of solution in the ampoules 7 Mass of solution in the ampoules
Dilution factor B 5 6
Background A 0.09* 228 measurements 0.09* 142 measurements
Decay correction B 0.4 From uncert. for 18F half-life 0.l From uncert. for 64Cu half-life
Calibration factor of IC (see appendix 2) B 38 Calibration by LTAC in August 2015 58 Calibration by LTAC in March 2016
Impurities B - 0.0l
Relative combined std uncertainty 40 59
*

Included in the first uncertainty component (ampoule to RRS ratio)