Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 21;20:642. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03251-w

Table 5.

Binary logistic regression predicting likelihood of pregnant women exposed to SHS (n = 1249)

Unadjusted a p value Adjusted b p value
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Religionc 0.428 (0.3410.358) < 0.001 0.399 (0.3120.510) < 0.001
Gravidity timesd 0.819 (0.6551.024) 0.080 0.731 (0.5700.937) 0.013
Smoking allowed at homee 1.655 (1.5171.829) < 0.001 1.710 (1.5491.918) 0.001
Husband smoke but not nearby (no tobacco use)f 1.643 (1.2812.107) < 0.001 1.568 (1.2052.041) 0.001
Husband smoke nearby (no tobacco use)f 15.748 (8.37629.608) < 0.001 17.438 (9.13933.276) < 0.001
Household tobacco user (except husband) smoke nearby (no tobacco use)f 3.040 (1.9164.823) < 0.001 2.232 (1.3513.687) 0.002

Adjusted with age, gravidity times, gestational weeks, knowledge of secondhand smoke harm, religion, location, work status

aSignificance p < 0.10

bSignificance p < 0.05

cReference category: Have a religion (versus non-religion)

dReference category: Gravidity times of 2 or more (versus the first gravidity)

eReference category: ‘Allowed’ (versus ‘Never allowed’ and ‘Not allowed, as a general rule’)

fDefinition: ‘nearby’ is in an extent of 5 m