Table 4.
Meta-regression analyses of potential source of heterogeneity
Heterogeneity Factors | Coefficient | SE | T | P-value | 95% CI | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UL | LL | ||||||
Publication Year | Dominant model | 0.035 | 0.041 | 0.85 | 0.40 | −0.048 | 1.119 |
Recessive model | 0.140 | 0.036 | 3.81 | 0.07 | −0.066 | 0.213 | |
Allelic model | 0.035 | 0.022 | 1.58 | 0.11 | −0.009 | 0.080 | |
TT vs. CC | 0.123 | 0.064 | 1.91 | 0.06 | −0.006 | 0.254 | |
CT vs. CC | 0.020 | 0.035 | 0.58 | 0.56 | −0.050 | 0.090 | |
continent | Dominant model | −0.238 | 0.265 | −0.90 | 0.37 | −0.772 | 0.294 |
Recessive model | 0.022 | 0.274 | 0.08 | 0.93 | −0.530 | 0.574 | |
Allelic model | −0.116 | 0.146 | −0.79 | 0.43 | −0.410 | 0.177 | |
AA vs. CC | −0.096 | 0.435 | −0.22 | 0.82 | −0.973 | 0.780 | |
CA vs. CC | −0.265 | 0.209 | −1.27 | 0.21 | −0.685 | 0.154 | |
Genotyping methods | Dominant model | −0.137 | 0.241 | −0.57 | 0.57 | −0.621 | 0.346 |
Recessive model | 0.382 | 0.232 | 1.65 | 0.10 | −0.084 | 0.849 | |
Allelic model | 0.039 | 0.130 | 0.30 | 0.76 | −0.221 | 0.300 | |
TT vs. CC | 0.056 | 0.388 | 0.14 | 0.88 | −0.726 | 0.838 | |
CT vs. CC | −0.114 | 0.199 | −0.57 | 0.57 | −0.515 | 0.287 |